Higgins v. Valentine

256 A.D. 673, 11 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4813
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The evidence fully justified the commissioner in finding the petitioner guilty of signing the name of one Graham to an application for a New York city license as stationary engineer and falsely testifying before the commissioner of accounts that he did not know Raymond D. Malarkey or Brian R. O’Reilly. The petitioner’s acquittal on charges contained in the first, second, fourth and sixth specifications does not necessarily imply that he was not guilty of these. It only decides that, as to these, his guilt was not established to the satisfaction of the commissioner.

The determination should be confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent.

[674]*674Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgins v. Valentine, 256 A.D. 673, 11 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 673 (Higgins v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finck v. Bliss
205 Misc. 775 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Murphy v. Valentine
259 A.D. 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)