Higgins v. . the Hocking Valley Railway Company
115 N.E. 1040, 220 N.Y. 646, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1101
Opinion
*647 Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative on opinion in Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co. (220 N. Y. 270).
Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Citodeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higgins v. . the Hocking Valley Railway Company, 115 N.E. 1040, 220 N.Y. 646, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1101 (N.Y. 1917).
115 N.E. 1040 (Higgins v. . the Hocking Valley Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robert Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co.
115 N.E. 711 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)