Higgins v. State

90 S.E.2d 40, 92 Ga. App. 739, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 703
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 27, 1955·No. 35825·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gardner, P. J.

There is but one question to be decided in this case. That question is, did the court abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty? Before sentence is passed one accused of a crime may withdraw his plea of guilty as a matter of right. After sentence has been passed it is within the discretion of the court as to whether or not the accused will be permitted to withdraw a plea of guilty. See Clark v. State, 72 Ga. App. 603 (34 S. E. 2d 608), Rowland v. State, 72 Ga. App. 793, 800 (35 S. E. 2d 372), and Boyett v. State, 81 Ga. App. 49 (57 S. E. 2d 831).

Under all the facts of this case the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty.

Judgment affirmed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgins v. State, 90 S.E.2d 40, 92 Ga. App. 739, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 703 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

90 S.E.2d 40 (Higgins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ware v. State
196 S.E.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)