Higgins v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Higgins v. State

164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 223, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 246

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 30, 1932

Docket22129

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 S.E. 108 (Higgins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgins v. State, 164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 223, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 246 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary, and excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The only two special grounds of the motion complain of the court’s charge on alibi and confessions. The defendant introduced no evidence, and his statement authorized the charge on the subject of alibi. The sworn testimony authorized the charge on confessions. The charge on each subject was adapted to the [224]*224facts and in compliance with the law. The evidence authorized the verdict, no error of law is shown, and the court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 30, 1932. Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Jenkins, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary, and excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The only two special grounds of the motion complain of the court’s charge on alibi and confessions. The defendant introduced no evidence, and his statement authorized the charge on the subject of alibi. The sworn testimony authorized the charge on confessions. The charge on each subject was adapted to the [224]*224facts and in compliance with the law. The evidence authorized the verdict, no error of law is shown, and the court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 30, 1932. Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Jenkins, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 S.E. 108, 45 Ga. App. 223, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-state-gactapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack