Higgins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Higgins v. State

855 So. 2d 716, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15077, 2003 WL 22299001

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 2003

DocketNo. 4D02-3245

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 855 So. 2d 716 (Higgins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgins v. State, 855 So. 2d 716, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15077, 2003 WL 22299001 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion and supplemental motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As to claims numbered 4 and 11, we remand to the trial court to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant’s claims, or to conduct an evidentia-ry hearing. As to appellants’ other claims, we affirm.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.

POLEN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion and supplemental motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As to claims numbered 4 and 11, we remand to the trial court to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant’s claims, or to conduct an evidentia-ry hearing. As to appellants’ other claims, we affirm.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.

POLEN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

855 So. 2d 716, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15077, 2003 WL 22299001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack