Higgins v. State
This text of 810 So. 2d 1044 (Higgins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carl P. Higgins, Appellant, filed a motion for postconviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and raised numerous claims. The trial court denied relief as to all the claims without holding an evidentiary hearing or attaching those portions of the record refuting the Appellant’s claims. We find that claims 1, 3, 4 and 8 are legally sufficient. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s denial of relief and remand for an evidentiary hearing or attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively refute these claims.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
810 So. 2d 1044, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3026, 2002 WL 385578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.