Higgins v. State

810 So. 2d 1044, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3026, 2002 WL 385578
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 2002
DocketNo. 4D01-3349
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 810 So. 2d 1044 (Higgins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higgins v. State, 810 So. 2d 1044, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3026, 2002 WL 385578 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carl P. Higgins, Appellant, filed a motion for postconviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and raised numerous claims. The trial court denied relief as to all the claims without holding an evidentiary hearing or attaching those portions of the record refuting the Appellant’s claims. We find that claims 1, 3, 4 and 8 are legally sufficient. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s denial of relief and remand for an evidentiary hearing or attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively refute these claims.

FARMER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higgins v. State
885 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1044, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3026, 2002 WL 385578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.