Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Higgins v. State

Higgins v. State

110 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 675
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 1926·No. 6 Div. 37.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of being a vagrant, and appealed. There is no bill of exceptions. The record proper, upon which the appeál is predicated, is regular and without apparent error. The judgment of conviction in the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgins v. State, 110 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

110 So. 921 (Higgins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.