Higgins v. State
110 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 675
This text of 110 So. 921 (Higgins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Higgins v. State, 110 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of being a vagrant, and appealed. There is no bill of exceptions. The record proper, upon which the appeál is predicated, is regular and without apparent error. The judgment of conviction in the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 So. 921, 21 Ala. App. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-state-alactapp-1926.