Higgins v. Schneider
164 A.2d 299, 33 N.J. 299, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 158
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.
Mr. Chief Justice Weintbaub and Mr. Justice Schettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Ereund.
For affirmance — Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Ebancis, Pkoctok and Hall — 5.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justice Schettino — 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higgins v. Schneider, 164 A.2d 299, 33 N.J. 299, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 158 (N.J. 1960).
164 A.2d 299 (Higgins v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carter v. University of Medicine & Dentistry
838 F. Supp. 957 (D. New Jersey, 1993)
Davis v. Drackett Products Co.
536 F. Supp. 694 (S.D. Ohio, 1982)
Reale v. Tp. of Wayne
332 A.2d 236 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Rost v. Bd. of Ed. Fair Lawn
325 A.2d 863 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
Henry v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
366 F. Supp. 1192 (D. New Jersey, 1973)
Paju Ex Rel. Paju v. Ricker
266 A.2d 836 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1970)
Knutsen v. BROWN
226 A.2d 460 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Friedrichsen v. Niemotka
177 A.2d 58 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Fernandi v. Strully
173 A.2d 277 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1961)