Higgins v. Schneider
This text of 164 A.2d 299 (Higgins v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.
Mr. Chief Justice Weintbaub and Mr. Justice Schettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Ereund.
For affirmance — Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Ebancis, Pkoctok and Hall — 5.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justice Schettino — 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 A.2d 299, 33 N.J. 299, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-schneider-nj-1960.