Higgins v. Ruppert

124 A.D. 530, 108 N.Y.S. 919, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2137
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 124 A.D. 530 (Higgins v. Ruppert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higgins v. Ruppert, 124 A.D. 530, 108 N.Y.S. 919, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

The plaintiff was at the desk in the defendant’s store paying for some .goods he was purchasing when a bundle of steel rods about ten feet long which was standing on end in the store against the edge or .jamb of the door, and was of the merchandise there, fell [531]*531over on his foot. There ivas evidence that the defendant was at the same time carrying out of the store to his wagon heavy iron sheets and that the jar from one of them on the sidewalk caused the bundle of rods to fall over. Be this as it may, the ilon-suit at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence was error. The mere fall of the bundle-sufficed to make out a case for the plaintiff for the jury. The maxim that the thing speaks for itself applied. It is a fair inference that the bundle would not have fallen if carefully placed. One who invites the public to his place of business is under the duty of reasonable care to make his place safe to those who come (Davis v. Ferris, 29 App. Div. 623; Schnizer v. Phillips, 108 id. 17; Dutton v. Greenwood Cemetery Co., 80 id. 352).

The judgment should be reversed.

Jenks, Hooker, Bich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Repecki v. Home Depot USA
942 F. Supp. 126 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Hawkins v. William F. Regan, Inc.
39 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Cameron v. H. C. Bohack Co.
27 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Cole v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
44 Misc. 2d 694 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Murphy v. City of New York
19 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Perito v. Sunrise Supermarket Corp.
33 Misc. 2d 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Robinson v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
184 Misc. 571 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Webber v. E. K. Larimer Hardware Co.
15 N.W.2d 286 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1944)
Levy v. Market & Fulton National Bank
153 N.Y.S. 972 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Gerbino v. Greenhut-Siegel-Cooper Co.
165 A.D. 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D. 530, 108 N.Y.S. 919, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-ruppert-nyappdiv-1908.