Higgins v. Oppenheim, Collins & Co.
This text of 215 A.D. 735 (Higgins v. Oppenheim, Collins & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award reversed and matter remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the findings of the Board do not definitely fix the period of time that the claimant remained upon the premises after his employment ceased, rendering it impossible for this court to determine whether the injury arose out of and in the course of his employment or whether he loitered upon the premises for an unreasonable time after his employment had ceased within the authority of Adams v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. (205 App. Div. 784). All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D. 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-oppenheim-collins-co-nyappdiv-1925.