Higgins v. Linstra
147 A. 909, 105 N.J. Eq. 246, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 566
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vme-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 104 N. J. Eq. 355.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higgins v. Linstra, 147 A. 909, 105 N.J. Eq. 246, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 566 (N.J. 1929).
147 A. 909 (Higgins v. Linstra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Laytham v. Mann
188 A. 242 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)