Higgins v. Kelly
This text of 84 A.D.3d 520 (Higgins v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered November 4, 2009, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to, among other things, annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner police officer’s application for accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The determination that petitioner’s condition was not job-related had a rational basis. The statutory presumption set forth in General Municipal Law § 207-k (as amended by L 2006, ch 654, § 1) was sufficiently rebutted by competent evidence that petitioner’s condition was caused by her cardiac arrhythmia, not a stroke (see Matter of DeMonico v Kelly, 49 AD3d 265, 266 [2008]). It was the sole province of the Medical Board [521]*521and the Board of Trustees to resolve the conflicts in evidence (see Matter of Santoro v Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept. Art.1-B Pension Fund, 217 AD2d 660, 660 [1995]). Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Moskowitz and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 32566(U).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.3d 520, 921 N.Y.S.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2011.