Higgins v. Gutierrez

Missouri Court of Appeals

Higgins v. Gutierrez

564 S.W.3d 400

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106595

StatusPublished

This text of 564 S.W.3d 400 (Higgins v. Gutierrez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgins v. Gutierrez, 564 S.W.3d 400 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nelda Higgins (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of Gerardo Gutierrez, M.D., on Appellant's wrongful death suit. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nelda Higgins (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of Gerardo Gutierrez, M.D., on Appellant's wrongful death suit. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 S.W.3d 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-gutierrez-moctapp-2018.