Higgins v. Department of Public Safety

138 So. 2d 530, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3429
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1962
DocketNo. 61-421
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 So. 2d 530 (Higgins v. Department of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higgins v. Department of Public Safety, 138 So. 2d 530, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3429 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s drivers license was suspended for one year by the Department of Public Safety of the State of Florida, effective March 27, 1961. The reason given was: “Incompetent — Incapable of operating a motor vehicle safely — subject to seizures.” The action was taken pursuant to a policy of the Department of Public Safety to withhold licenses from such persons (by successive one year suspensions) until they go two years without a seizure. Appellant petitioned the circuit court for restoration of his license.1 The court heard the cause and denied the petition upon determining there was “no showing to this court that the petition should be granted.” On his [531]*531petition the appellant had presented evidence and arguments to dispute the administrative finding that he was incompetent to drive; representing that his seizures occurred only at night, at which time he did not drive, and then only when he neglected preventive medication. There was evidence, however, that he had failed to take medication on occasions, and that he had experienced a seizure or what appeared to be such a seizure once in the daytime while driving. The trial judge before whom the matter was heard had the duty to determine the credibility, reasonableness and weight of the evidence presented. Our examination of the record shows the decree appealed from was supported by competent substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of the trial judge were not erroneous in fact or in law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DMV v. Granziel
565 A.2d 404 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 2d 530, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-department-of-public-safety-fladistctapp-1962.