Higgins v. Carr Bros.

Supreme Court

Higgins v. Carr Bros.

316 U.S. 658, 62 S. Ct. 1310

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 8, 1942·No. No. 1252·Published

Opinion

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Su[659]*659preme Judicial Court of Maine is granted. In view of the Act of August 24, 1937 (28 U. S. C., § 401), the Court hereby certifies to the Attorney General of the United States that the constitutionality of the Fair Labor Standards Act is drawn in question in this case.

Mr. Franz U. Burkett for petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Su[659]*659preme Judicial Court of Maine is granted. In view of the Act of August 24, 1937 (28 U. S. C., § 401), the Court hereby certifies to the Attorney General of the United States that the constitutionality of the Fair Labor Standards Act is drawn in question in this case.

Mr. Franz U. Burkett for petitioner.

Higgins v. Carr Bros., 316 U.S. 658, 62 S. Ct. 1310 (1942).

Pincite

316 U.S. 658 (Higgins v. Carr Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.