Higgins v. Carr Bros.

Supreme Court

Higgins v. Carr Bros.

316 U.S. 658, 62 S. Ct. 1310

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 8, 1942

DocketNo. 1252

StatusPublished

This text of 316 U.S. 658 (Higgins v. Carr Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgins v. Carr Bros., 316 U.S. 658, 62 S. Ct. 1310 (1942).

Pincite

Opinion

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Su[659]*659preme Judicial Court of Maine is granted. In view of the Act of August 24, 1937 (28 U. S. C., § 401), the Court hereby certifies to the Attorney General of the United States that the constitutionality of the Fair Labor Standards Act is drawn in question in this case.

Mr. Franz U. Burkett for petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Su[659]*659preme Judicial Court of Maine is granted. In view of the Act of August 24, 1937 (28 U. S. C., § 401), the Court hereby certifies to the Attorney General of the United States that the constitutionality of the Fair Labor Standards Act is drawn in question in this case.

Mr. Franz U. Burkett for petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 U.S. 658, 62 S. Ct. 1310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-carr-bros-scotus-1942.