Higgins v. Boston & Maine Railroad

102 A. 553, 78 N.H. 609, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 64
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided November 6, 1917·Published

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

The case comes up on agreed facts, which were apparently intended to present the question of the validity of a limitation of actions under the federal statute for damage to goods being transported in interstate commerce. The question is a federal one, and the provision in the uniform bill of lading, requiring notice of claims within four months, has been upheld by the court of last resort. Georgia, &c., R. R. Co. v. Blish Milling Co., 241 U. S. 190; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McLaughlin, 242 U. S. 142.

Judgment for the defendant.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgins v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 102 A. 553, 78 N.H. 609, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 64 (N.H. 1917).

102 A. 553 (Higgins v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McLaughlin
242 U.S. 142 (Supreme Court, 1916)