Higgins, Roger Eugene Jr.
This text of Higgins, Roger Eugene Jr. (Higgins, Roger Eugene Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-61,133-03
ROGER EUGENE HIGGINS, JR., Relator
v.
THE DISTRICT CLERK OF DALLAS COUNTY, Respondent
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NO. W89-A6337-J IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3
DALLAS COUNTY
The order was delivered per curiam.This is an original application for a writ of mandamus.
Relator contends that he filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, but that the application has not been forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals even though more than thirty-five days have elapsed. Relator's contentions present a colorable claim to have prompt resolution of any grounds raised in such an application.
It is this Court's opinion that additional information is required before a decision can be reached. Therefore, the Respondent, District Clerk of Dallas County, is ordered to file with this Court within thirty days a response by submitting the record on such application or a copy of a timely entered order designating issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992), or by stating the nature of any application filed by Relator such that it is not filed pursuant to Article 11.07, § 3, V.A.C.C.P., or that no application by applicant has been filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this the 4th day of OCTOBER, 2006.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Higgins, Roger Eugene Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-roger-eugene-jr-texcrimapp-2006.