Higgins Oil & Fuel Co. v. Snow

113 F. 433, 51 C.C.A. 267, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 1902
DocketNo. 1,114
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 113 F. 433 (Higgins Oil & Fuel Co. v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higgins Oil & Fuel Co. v. Snow, 113 F. 433, 51 C.C.A. 267, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965 (5th Cir. 1902).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As, by the record, the appellee, Mrs. Snow, is seised of an estate for life in one undivided one-eighteenth part of the lands described in the decree appealed from, and to that extent is a tenant in common with the owners of the fee, we all agree that she is interested in and entitled to an accounting for all oil developed and produced on and from the said lands to the prejudice of her estate, and to that end a receiver was properly appointed pending the litigation necessary to finally determine the full rights of the appellee. On this appeal no other questions need be passed upon.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1961
Youngman v. Shular
281 S.W.2d 373 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Schoenfeld v. Chapman
200 Misc. 444 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Texas Co. v. Marlin
109 F.2d 305 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)
Baze v. Scott
106 F.2d 365 (Tenth Circuit, 1939)
Baze v. Scott
24 F. Supp. 806 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1938)
Brock v. Barnsdall Oil Co.
22 F. Supp. 786 (N.D. Texas, 1938)
Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. Bruhlmeyer
115 S.W.2d 1212 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Phelan v. Roberts
1938 OK 139 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Montana
92 F.2d 693 (Ninth Circuit, 1937)
Davis v. Atlantic Oil Producing Co.
87 F.2d 75 (Fifth Circuit, 1936)
Fleming v. Commissioner
6 B.T.A. 900 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)
Gay v. Focke
291 F. 721 (Ninth Circuit, 1923)
Whitaker v. Surtees
248 S.W. 432 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Crain v. West
229 S.W. 51 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Parker v. Riley
243 F. 42 (Eighth Circuit, 1917)
Daniels v. Charles
189 S.W. 192 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1916)
Barnes v. Keys
1912 OK 485 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Harris v. Defenbaugh
109 P. 681 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 F. 433, 51 C.C.A. 267, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-oil-fuel-co-v-snow-ca5-1902.