Higgins, Ex Parte Andie M.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Higgins, Ex Parte Andie M.

DecidedOctober 8, 2003

DocketAP-74,771

StatusPublished

This text of Higgins, Ex Parte Andie M. (Higgins, Ex Parte Andie M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgins, Ex Parte Andie M., (Tex. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 74,771

EX PARTE ANDIE M. HIGGINS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM ROCKWALL COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O P I N I O N

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and punishment was assessed at life imprisonment. No appeal was taken from this conviction.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to a meaningful appeal when his counsel failed to advise him that he could get appointed counsel and a free record for appeal. A hearing was conducted at which counsel admitted that he failed to advise Applicant of these facts because Applicant indicated he wanted different counsel on appeal, and counsel did tell Applicant that there was a thirty day limit on filing notice of appeal. The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law in which it found Applicant is indigent and wants to appeal, and that counsel did not advise Applicant of his right to have appointed counsel and a free record for appeal, and recommended that an out-of-time appeal be granted.

Relief is granted. Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal in cause number 2-01-315 in the 382nd Judicial District Court of Rockwall County. Applicant is ordered returned to that point in time at which he may give written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date that the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to see that written notice of appeal is given within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.

DELIVERED: October 8, 2003

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 74,771

EX PARTE ANDIE M. HIGGINS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM ROCKWALL COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O P I N I O N

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and punishment was assessed at life imprisonment. No appeal was taken from this conviction.

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to a meaningful appeal when his counsel failed to advise him that he could get appointed counsel and a free record for appeal. A hearing was conducted at which counsel admitted that he failed to advise Applicant of these facts because Applicant indicated he wanted different counsel on appeal, and counsel did tell Applicant that there was a thirty day limit on filing notice of appeal. The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law in which it found Applicant is indigent and wants to appeal, and that counsel did not advise Applicant of his right to have appointed counsel and a free record for appeal, and recommended that an out-of-time appeal be granted.

Relief is granted. Applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal in cause number 2-01-315 in the 382nd Judicial District Court of Rockwall County. Applicant is ordered returned to that point in time at which he may give written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date that the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to see that written notice of appeal is given within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.

DELIVERED: October 8, 2003

DO NOT PUBLISH

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Higgins, Ex Parte Andie M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-ex-parte-andie-m-texcrimapp-2003.