Higgins Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United States of America, Dunord Land Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United States

566 F.2d 595, 41 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1161, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5854
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 29, 1977
Docket77-1301
StatusPublished

This text of 566 F.2d 595 (Higgins Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United States of America, Dunord Land Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higgins Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United States of America, Dunord Land Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United States, 566 F.2d 595, 41 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1161, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5854 (8th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

566 F.2d 595

77-2 USTC P 9755

HIGGINS COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
DuNORD LAND COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1301, 77-1302.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1977.
Decided Nov. 29, 1977.

Loren W. Sanford, Duluth, Minn., for appellants.

Mary L. Jennings, Atty., Appellate Section, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., (argued) for appellee; Myron C. Baum, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Thorwald H. Anderson, Jr., U. S. Atty., Gilbert E. Andrews and Grant W. Wiprud, Attys., Washington, D. C., on brief.

Before HEANEY, WEBSTER and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly held that Minnesota state income taxes on iron ore royalties are not an allowable expenditure under I.R.C. § 272 and thus taxpayers may only deduct them from ordinary income rather than adding those taxes to basis under I.R.C. § 631(c).

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and records and are convinced that no error of law was committed by the trial court. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the opinion of the trial court. Higgins Co. v. United States, 39 AFTR2d 77-702 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higgins Co. v. United States
566 F.2d 595 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 F.2d 595, 41 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1161, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-company-a-minnesota-corporation-v-united-s-ca8-1977.