Higginbotham v. City of Rome
100 S.E. 720, 24 Ga. App. 286, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 573
Opinion
The petition in this ease (a suit for damages for the negligent homicide of the plaintiff’s husband) sufficiently set forth a cause of action .against the City of Rome. The court erred in sustaining the demurrer and in dismissing the suit. The case of Zettler v. City of Atlanta, 66 Ga. 195, relied on by counsel for the city, is clearly distinguishable from this ease.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higginbotham v. City of Rome, 100 S.E. 720, 24 Ga. App. 286, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
100 S.E. 720 (Higginbotham v. City of Rome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richards v. Mayor of Americus
282 S.E.2d 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Atlanta Muffler Shop, Inc. v. McSwain
106 S.E.2d 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
City Council of Augusta v. Hammock
69 S.E.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
City of Bainbridge v. Cox
64 S.E.2d 192 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Hammock v. City Council of Augusta
63 S.E.2d 290 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
City of Atlanta v. Guice
152 S.E. 144 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Higginbotham v. City of Rome
117 S.E. 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)