Higginbotham v. Chamberlayne

Supreme Court of Virginia

Higginbotham v. Chamberlayne

4 Munf. 547, 18 Va. 547, 1815 Va. LEXIS 58

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedDecember 11, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 547 (Higginbotham v. Chamberlayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higginbotham v. Chamberlayne, 4 Munf. 547, 18 Va. 547, 1815 Va. LEXIS 58 (Va. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

The president pronounced the court’s opinion, (without deciding the other points occurring in the cause,) that the Superior court erred in not granting a continuance on account of the absence of Wyatt Starke, the witness in the bill of exceptions mentioned; the reason given by the court for rejecting the same being insufficient.

Judgment reversed 5 verdict set aside, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The president pronounced the court’s opinion, (without deciding the other points occurring in the cause,) that the Superior court erred in not granting a continuance on account of the absence of Wyatt Starke, the witness in the bill of exceptions mentioned; the reason given by the court for rejecting the same being insufficient.

Judgment reversed 5 verdict set aside, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Munf. 547, 18 Va. 547, 1815 Va. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higginbotham-v-chamberlayne-va-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack