Higginbotham v. Chamberlayne
4 Munf. 547, 18 Va. 547, 1815 Va. LEXIS 58
Opinion
The president pronounced the court’s opinion, (without deciding the other points occurring in the cause,) that the Superior court erred in not granting a continuance on account of the absence of Wyatt Starke, the witness in the bill of exceptions mentioned; the reason given by the court for rejecting the same being insufficient.
Judgment reversed 5 verdict set aside, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higginbotham v. Chamberlayne, 4 Munf. 547, 18 Va. 547, 1815 Va. LEXIS 58 (Va. 1815).
4 Munf. 547 (Higginbotham v. Chamberlayne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phillips v. Commonwealth
18 S.E. 841 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1894)
Welch v. Commonwealth
18 S.E. 273 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1893)
Walton v. Commonwealth
73 Va. 855 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1879)
Harman v. Howe
27 Va. 676 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
McDougald v. Central Bank
3 Ga. 185 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1847)
Vanblaricum v. Ward
1 Blackf. 50 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1819)
Holt v. Commonwealth
2 Va. 156 (General Court of Virginia, 1819)