Higgenbotham v. DPM OF MISSOURI

334 S.W.3d 921, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 439, 2011 WL 1004815
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 2011·No. ED 95240·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Higgenbotham appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and incorporating the Administrative Law Judge’s award of permanent partial disability benefits and future medical treatment in the form of pain management. We find that the Commission did not err in its final award.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgenbotham v. DPM OF MISSOURI, 334 S.W.3d 921, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 439, 2011 WL 1004815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

334 S.W.3d 921 (Higgenbotham v. DPM OF MISSOURI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jamerson
334 S.W.3d 921 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)