Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Higgenbotham v. DPM OF MISSOURI

Higgenbotham v. DPM OF MISSOURI

334 S.W.3d 921, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 439, 2011 WL 1004815
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 22, 2011
DocketED 95240
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 334 S.W.3d 921 (Higgenbotham v. DPM OF MISSOURI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higgenbotham v. DPM OF MISSOURI, 334 S.W.3d 921, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 439, 2011 WL 1004815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Higgenbotham appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and incorporating the Administrative Law Judge’s award of permanent partial disability benefits and future medical treatment in the form of pain management. We find that the Commission did not err in its final award.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jamerson
334 S.W.3d 921 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 S.W.3d 921, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 439, 2011 WL 1004815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgenbotham-v-dpm-of-missouri-moctapp-2011.