Higdon v. State

709 So. 2d 572, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175, 1998 WL 95331
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1998
DocketNo. 96-02031
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 709 So. 2d 572 (Higdon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higdon v. State, 709 So. 2d 572, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175, 1998 WL 95331 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant, convicted by a jury of sexual battery on a child under twelve, challenges his conviction and his sentence. While we find no error in appellant’s conviction, we remand his sentence for correction to reflect the twenty-five-year minimum mandatory sentence that applies to appellant’s offense under section 775.082(1)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). We also note that the court failed to orally announce the $2 cost at sentencing in violation of Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, that cost is stricken.

BLUE and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waller v. State
911 So. 2d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
King v. Young, Berkman, Berman & Karpf
709 So. 2d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 So. 2d 572, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2175, 1998 WL 95331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higdon-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.