Higdon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Higdon v. State

564 So. 2d 650, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5837, 1990 WL 111952

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 8, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2228

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 650 (Higdon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higdon v. State, 564 So. 2d 650, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5837, 1990 WL 111952 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentence. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in assessing thirty (30) excess points against appellant on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. However, even with the deletion of these points the trial court’s sentence is well within the permitted and recommended range of sentences set out in the guidelines.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentence. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in assessing thirty (30) excess points against appellant on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. However, even with the deletion of these points the trial court’s sentence is well within the permitted and recommended range of sentences set out in the guidelines.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 650, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5837, 1990 WL 111952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higdon-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.