Higdon (Robert E.) v. Nagle (James D., Mary), Jim Nagle's Rebuilt Truck Parts & Sales, Inc

39 F.3d 1169
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 1994
Docket93-3441
StatusPublished

This text of 39 F.3d 1169 (Higdon (Robert E.) v. Nagle (James D., Mary), Jim Nagle's Rebuilt Truck Parts & Sales, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Higdon (Robert E.) v. Nagle (James D., Mary), Jim Nagle's Rebuilt Truck Parts & Sales, Inc, 39 F.3d 1169 (3d Cir. 1994).

Opinion

39 F.3d 1169

Higdon (Robert E.)
v.
Nagle (James D., Mary), Jim Nagle's Rebuilt Truck Parts & Sales, Inc.

NOS. 93-3441, 93-3479

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Sept 23, 1994

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 F.3d 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higdon-robert-e-v-nagle-james-d-mary-jim-nagles-re-ca3-1994.