HIGBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. Sartor

991 A.2d 305
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 23, 2010·No. 540 MAL 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*306 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2010, it appearing that the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County erred in granting Respondents’ preliminary objections as to Petitioner’s intentional tort claims on the basis that Petitioner had failed adequately to allege willful misconduct, and it further appearing that the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming that determination, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated July 14, 2008 is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County to reinstate Petitioner’s intentional tort claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIGBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. Sartor, 991 A.2d 305 (Pa. 2010).

991 A.2d 305 (HIGBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. Sartor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. Oakes v. J. Richardson
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Cornell Narberth, LLC v. Borough of Narberth
167 A.3d 228 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)