Higbie v. Edgarton

New York Court of Chancery

Higbie v. Edgarton

3 Paige Ch. 253

CourtNew York Court of Chancery

DecidedApril 19, 1831

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Paige Ch. 253 (Higbie v. Edgarton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higbie v. Edgarton, 3 Paige Ch. 253 (N.Y. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor

said the defendant should have appeared and opposed "the former application, if he had any reasons to show why the order then asked for should not be made. That if the order was improper, or had been obtained against him through any inadvertence or mistake, his proper course was to apply to open the motion, or to vacate the order.' The attachment was therefore granted; but with liberty to the defendant to apply, at the next motion day, to vacate the former order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor

said the defendant should have appeared and opposed "the former application, if he had any reasons to show why the order then asked for should not be made. That if the order was improper, or had been obtained against him through any inadvertence or mistake, his proper course was to apply to open the motion, or to vacate the order.' The attachment was therefore granted; but with liberty to the defendant to apply, at the next motion day, to vacate the former order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Paige Ch. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higbie-v-edgarton-nychanct-1831.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack