Higbee v. Thomas

375 U.S. 13, 84 S. Ct. 79, 11 L. Ed. 2d 41, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 517
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1963·No. No. 6·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky for further consideration in light of Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. Claudy, 350 U. S. 116.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higbee v. Thomas, 375 U.S. 13, 84 S. Ct. 79, 11 L. Ed. 2d 41, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 517 (1963).

375 U.S. 13 (Higbee v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. Commonwealth
411 S.W.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1967)
Higbee v. Thomas
376 S.W.2d 305 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1964)