Hiers v. Ward
44 Ga. 652
Opinion
There was no entry of service in the bill of exceptions, and for that defendant’s counsel moved to dismiss it. Plaintiff’s counsel said that the service of the bill of exceptions was entrusted to local counsel, and asked time to show that service was perfected. The Court refused to give time, and said service must appear on the bill of exception.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hiers v. Ward, 44 Ga. 652 (Ga. 1872).
44 Ga. 652 (Hiers v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. McKelvin
105 S.E. 600 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)