Hiering v. United States
This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 659 (Hiering v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon a stipulation limiting the appeals to the items described on the invoices as No. 351 Pedals, inch axle. On the basis of the stipulated facts I find export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis of value of the said pedals, and that such value in each case is the invoiced unit value net, less nondutiable charges as noted on the invoices.
The said appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, they are to that extent dismissed. Judgment will issue accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Cust. Ct. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiering-v-united-states-cusc-1960.