Hiering v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 659
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 19, 1960
DocketReap. Dec. 9670; Entry No. 4065, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 659 (Hiering v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hiering v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 659 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon a stipulation limiting the appeals to the items described on the invoices as No. 351 Pedals, inch axle. On the basis of the stipulated facts I find export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis of value of the said pedals, and that such value in each case is the invoiced unit value net, less nondutiable charges as noted on the invoices.

The said appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, they are to that extent dismissed. Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiering-v-united-states-cusc-1960.