Hiering v. United States
This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 684 (Hiering v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise answering to the description of No. 351 Pedals, y2" axle, and that such value is the invoiced unit values, net, less nondutiable charges as noted on the invoices.
The appeals having been abandoned as to all merchandise other than that described above, they are, to that extent, dismissed.
Judgment will issue accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Cust. Ct. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiering-v-united-states-cusc-1959.