Hien Xuan Cao v. Holder

361 F. App'x 760
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 2010
Docket06-73632
StatusUnpublished

This text of 361 F. App'x 760 (Hien Xuan Cao v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hien Xuan Cao v. Holder, 361 F. App'x 760 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hien Xuan Cao, a native and citizen of Vietnam, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Cao fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s June 28, 2006, decision denying reopening. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues that are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s August 4, 2003, order dismissing Cao’s direct appeal from the immigration judge’s decision because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 F. App'x 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hien-xuan-cao-v-holder-ca9-2010.