Hiebink v. Hiebink
269 A.D. 786, 56 N.Y.S.2d 397
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In an action for annulment on the ground that defendant was physically incapable of entering into the marriage state, interlocutory judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and order denying defendant’s motion for an allowance and counsel fee to prosecute her appeal from the judgment herein, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hiebink v. Hiebink, 269 A.D. 786, 56 N.Y.S.2d 397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 786 (Hiebink v. Hiebink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gabriel v. Gabriel
274 A.D. 141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)