Hidden v. Raynolds
234 A.D. 796
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 234 A.D. 796 (Hidden v. Raynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hidden v. Raynolds, 234 A.D. 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Judgment, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the ground that Raynolds accomplished all he could legally do when he assumed to prevent a contest by all who lawfully could be advised or controlled by him; Scudder, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Estate of Cronin
143 Misc. 559 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hidden-v-raynolds-nyappdiv-1931.