Hidden v. Raynolds
234 A.D. 796
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the ground that Raynolds accomplished all he could legally do when he assumed to prevent a contest by all who lawfully could be advised or controlled by him; Scudder, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hidden v. Raynolds, 234 A.D. 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
234 A.D. 796 (Hidden v. Raynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Cronin
143 Misc. 559 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)