Hidalgo v. State
47 So. 3d 964, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17681, 2010 WL 4628563
This text of 47 So. 3d 964 (Hidalgo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hidalgo v. State, 47 So. 3d 964, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17681, 2010 WL 4628563 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
Appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion alleges entitlement to additional credit for time served. We reverse and remand for a hearing or the attachment of records conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to that relief. See Langdon v. State, 947 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Langdon v. State
947 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 So. 3d 964, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17681, 2010 WL 4628563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hidalgo-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.