Hidalgo v. Keys Granite, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hidalgo v. Keys Granite, Inc.

889 So. 2d 122, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17940, 2004 WL 2727755

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 2004

DocketNo. 3D04-795

StatusPublished

This text of 889 So. 2d 122 (Hidalgo v. Keys Granite, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hidalgo v. Keys Granite, Inc., 889 So. 2d 122, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17940, 2004 WL 2727755 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Hidalgo appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Hidalgo appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

889 So. 2d 122, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17940, 2004 WL 2727755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hidalgo-v-keys-granite-inc-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack