Hidalgo v. Heights Investment Group

242 A.D.2d 516, 663 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9164

This text of 242 A.D.2d 516 (Hidalgo v. Heights Investment Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hidalgo v. Heights Investment Group, 242 A.D.2d 516, 663 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered on or about August 9, 1996, which denied defendants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record does not support defendant’s claim that plaintiff deliberately misrepresented her residence on the complaint as Bronx County when in fact it was New York County, and, accordingly, defendants are not entitled to a change of venue as a matter of right (see, Berberich v York Scaffold Equip. Corp., 177 AD2d 451, 452). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berberich v. York Scaffold Equipment Corp.
177 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D.2d 516, 663 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hidalgo-v-heights-investment-group-nyappdiv-1997.