Hicock v. McKay
This text of 78 Mass. 218 (Hicock v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of opinion that the instruments
produced by the plaintiff at the trial showed contracts between the plaintiff and the defendant. The consideration moved from the plaintiff, and the agreement to credit an equal amount to Ayres has no tendency to show that the agreement was for the benefit of Ayres and not of the plaintiff. No evidence of the relations of the parties was introduced, and the case turns simply upon the construction of the written contract. It is not a [220]*220question for whose benefit, but to whom the promise was made. And the consideration of the contract, as well as the whole form of the instruments, shows that it was with the plaintiff.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 Mass. 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicock-v-mckay-mass-1858.