Hicksville Development & Construction Co. v. Palmer

244 A.D. 800

This text of 244 A.D. 800 (Hicksville Development & Construction Co. v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicksville Development & Construction Co. v. Palmer, 244 A.D. 800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Nassau county granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer of the defendant and directing judgment in favor of the plaintiff under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the judgment entered thereon, in an action to recover rent, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that there was an issue presented for' trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Carswell and Seudder, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicksville-development-construction-co-v-palmer-nyappdiv-1935.