Hickson v. State ex rel. Woodridge Building Corp.
226 So. 2d 233, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5250
Opinions
The briefs and the record in this case have been thoroughly examined. In our opinion the appellants have not demonstrated any error in the issuance of the peremptory writ of mandamus by the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida. The peremptory writ of mandamus here under review is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hickson v. State ex rel. Woodridge Building Corp., 226 So. 2d 233, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
226 So. 2d 233 (Hickson v. State ex rel. Woodridge Building Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Board of Public Instruction of Duval County v. Sack
212 So. 2d 819 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
City of Miami v. State ex rel. Houston
120 So. 2d 459 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Department of Public Safety Driver's License Division v. Mitchell
152 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Johnson
30 Fla. 433 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)