Hickson v. State ex rel. Woodridge Building Corp.
226 So. 2d 233, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5250
This text of 226 So. 2d 233 (Hickson v. State ex rel. Woodridge Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hickson v. State ex rel. Woodridge Building Corp., 226 So. 2d 233, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
Opinions
The briefs and the record in this case have been thoroughly examined. In our opinion the appellants have not demonstrated any error in the issuance of the peremptory writ of mandamus by the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida. The peremptory writ of mandamus here under review is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Board of Public Instruction of Duval County v. Sack
212 So. 2d 819 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
City of Miami v. State ex rel. Houston
120 So. 2d 459 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Department of Public Safety Driver's License Division v. Mitchell
152 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Johnson
30 Fla. 433 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
226 So. 2d 233, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickson-v-state-ex-rel-woodridge-building-corp-fladistctapp-1969.