Hicks v. Wilson

24 Ark. 628
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 Ark. 628 (Hicks v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Wilson, 24 Ark. 628 (Ark. 1867).

Opinion

Mr. Justice ClendeniN

delivered the opinion of tbe court.

This is a writ of error to the circuit court of Marion county. The defendant in error, Wilson, brought his suit against the plaintiff in error before a justice of the peace. At the appearance of the parties, on motion of the defendant before the justice, the suit was dismissed, and Wilson appealed to the circuit court. In the circuit court, the case was submitted to the court sitting as a jury and judgment was given for the plaintiff, (Wilson.) The defendant moved for a new trial, which was overruled; and the defendant did not except to the ruling of the court.

The uniform doctrine of this court has been that where there has been no exception taken to a refusal of the court to granta new trial, the supreme court cannot revise the' decision on the motion, and the party making the motion will be regarded as •acquiescing. See Moss adm'r. vs. Smith, 19 Ark., 683.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danks v. Rodeheaver
26 W. Va. 274 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Ark. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-wilson-ark-1867.