Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp.

261 F. App'x 551

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 7, 2008·No. No. 07-1287·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hicks, Clyde Casey, and Jean Casey appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to remand and granting Wilshire Credit Corporation’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court [552]*552at the hearing held on February 26, 2007. Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., No. 8:06-cv-02195-RWT (D.Md. Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gary Hicks, Clyde Casey, and Jean Casey appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to remand and granting Wilshire Credit Corporation’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court [552]*552at the hearing held on February 26, 2007. Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., No. 8:06-cv-02195-RWT (D.Md. Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., 261 F. App'x 551 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

261 F. App'x 551 (Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.