Home/Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama/Hicks v. Westbrook

Hicks v. Westbrook

537 So. 2d 490, 1988 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 341, 1988 WL 113245
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedOctober 26, 1988
DocketCiv. 5691
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 537 So. 2d 490 (Hicks v. Westbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Westbrook, 537 So. 2d 490, 1988 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 341, 1988 WL 113245 (Ala. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

BRADLEY, Presiding Judge.

Upon remand to this court by the Supreme Court of Alabama, 537 So.2d 486, it is considered that this cause should be reversed in part in accordance with the opinion rendered by the supreme court on May 27, 1988. The cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Etowah County for entry of judgment setting aside the judgment entered in favor of Cardinal Transport Company, Inc., on its motion for a directed verdict and granting plaintiffs a new trial.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS ON REMAND.

HOLMES and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M. Durbin & Co. of Jasper, Inc. v. Ala. Dept. of Env. Mgmt.
537 So. 2d 490 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 So. 2d 490, 1988 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 341, 1988 WL 113245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-westbrook-alacivapp-1988.