Hicks v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

130 A.2d 761, 213 Md. 625
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 1, 1972
Docket[H.C. No. 72, October Term, 1956.]
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 130 A.2d 761 (Hicks v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 130 A.2d 761, 213 Md. 625 (Md. 1972).

Opinion

*626 Bruñe, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application by Leroy Jefferson Hicks for leave to appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Lester L. Barrett of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. Petitioner was convicted of armed robbery on August 31, 1955, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore and sentenced to twenty years in the Maryland Penitentiary.

Petitioner sets out a statement of the alleged facts in the case, and questions the weight and sufficiency of the evidence. Such questions cannot be raised on habeas corpus. Williams v. Warden, 211 Md. 621, 125 A. 2d 672.

Petitioner complains that force was used to obtain a confession. This goes to its voluntary character and such a question could be raised on appeal, but may not be reviewed on habeas corpus. White v. Warden, 211 Md. 623, 126 A. 2d 294.

The petitioner’s complaint that his counsel did not properly protect his rights is not a ground for a writ of habeas corpus in the absence of any allegations of collusion or fraud with State officials, or objections raised in the trial court. Davis v. Warden, 211 Md. 617, 125 A. 2d 674.

Petitioner also complains that he was placed in double jeopardy because the police arrested him once, placed him in a police lineup, released him and then re-arrested him. This does not constitute double jeopardy. Even if it did, it could not be raised on habeas corpus. Miller v. Warden, 210 Md. 676, 124 A. 2d 286, and cases there cited.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Azulay v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
135 A.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Young v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
145 A.2d 238 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Rice v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
135 A.2d 622 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Cooper v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
136 A.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Savage v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
139 A.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1991)
Wain v. Warden
138 A.2d 482 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1967)
Dobson v. Warden
188 F. Supp. 599 (D. Maryland, 1960)
Peaton v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
139 A.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)
Godwin v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
139 A.2d 266 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)
McMahan v. Warden
215 Md. 600 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1957)
Dobson v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
135 A.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1957)
Topp v. Superintendent of Maryland Reformatory for Males
136 A.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.2d 761, 213 Md. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1972.