Hicks v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hicks v. Wainwright

257 So. 2d 110, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 9247

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 3, 1972·No. No. 71-767·Published

Opinion

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the State’s response thereto, it is the opinion of this Court that the Petition is procedurally faulty and that Petitioner’s right to relief has not been adequately demonstrated. We dismiss but without prejudice to Petitioner’s right to appropriately move for dismissal of the information and if then aggrieved to seek mandamus, if he is so advised. Dickey v. Circuit Court, Gadsen County, Quincy, Florida, Fla.1967, 200 So.2d 521.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the State’s response thereto, it is the opinion of this Court that the Petition is procedurally faulty and that Petitioner’s right to relief has not been adequately demonstrated. We dismiss but without prejudice to Petitioner’s right to appropriately move for dismissal of the information and if then aggrieved to seek mandamus, if he is so advised. Dickey v. Circuit Court, Gadsen County, Quincy, Florida, Fla.1967, 200 So.2d 521.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

Hicks v. Wainwright, 257 So. 2d 110, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 9247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

257 So. 2d 110 (Hicks v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related