Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Hicks v. Wadsworth

Hicks v. Wadsworth

192 S.E. 729, 184 Ga. 681, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 615
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 14, 1937
DocketNo. 11900
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 192 S.E. 729 (Hicks v. Wadsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Wadsworth, 192 S.E. 729, 184 Ga. 681, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 615 (Ga. 1937).

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

Under tlie facts of tlie instant case, the prayers of the petition, and the questions presented for review by the bill of exceptions and the record, a construction of the will, if involved at all, is only incidentally involved. The Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of the writ of error. Code, § 2-3005; Reece v. McCrary, 179 Ga. 812 (177 S. E. 741).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Beil, J-, absent because of illness. A. J. Gamp and G. B. McGarily, for plaintiffs in error. William G. ilIcJlae, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darnell v. Tate
64 S.E.2d 582 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Roberts v. Wilson
31 S.E.2d 707 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
McDowell v. McDowell
20 S.E.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 S.E. 729, 184 Ga. 681, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-wadsworth-ga-1937.