Hicks v. Wadsworth

192 S.E. 729, 184 Ga. 681, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 615
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 14, 1937·No. No. 11900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

Under tlie facts of tlie instant case, the prayers of the petition, and the questions presented for review by the bill of exceptions and the record, a construction of the will, if involved at all, is only incidentally involved. The Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of the writ of error. Code, § 2-3005; Reece v. McCrary, 179 Ga. 812 (177 S. E. 741).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Beil, J-, absent because of illness. A. J. Gamp and G. B. McGarily, for plaintiffs in error. William G. ilIcJlae, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. Wadsworth, 192 S.E. 729, 184 Ga. 681, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 615 (Ga. 1937).

192 S.E. 729 (Hicks v. Wadsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darnell v. Tate
64 S.E.2d 582 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Roberts v. Wilson
31 S.E.2d 707 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
McDowell v. McDowell
20 S.E.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)