Hicks v. U.S. Department of Labor

623 F. App'x 74
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2015·No. No. 15-2072·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elbert Hicks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hicks v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, No. 2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts arid legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[75] gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. U.S. Department of Labor, 623 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2015).

623 F. App'x 74 (Hicks v. U.S. Department of Labor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.