Hicks v. U.S. Department of Labor

Fourth Circuit

Hicks v. U.S. Department of Labor

623 F. App'x 74

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 23, 2015

DocketNo. 15-2072

StatusPublished

This text of 623 F. App'x 74 (Hicks v. U.S. Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. U.S. Department of Labor, 623 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elbert Hicks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hicks v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, No. 2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts arid legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[75]*75gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elbert Hicks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hicks v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, No. 2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts arid legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[75]*75gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 F. App'x 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-us-department-of-labor-ca4-2015.