Hicks v. United States Postal Service
This text of 584 F. App'x 935 (Hicks v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
ON MOTION
The United States Postal Service moves without opposition to dismiss Elbert Hicks’s appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”).
Any petition for review of a Board decision must be filed within 60 days after the Board issues notice of its final order or decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A). The petition for review must be received by this court before the expiration of [936]*936§ 7703(b)(l)(A)’s filing deadline. Pinat v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 931 F.2d 1544, 1546 (Fed.Cir.1991) (citing Fed. R.App. P. 15(a), 25(a)). The 60-day period for appeal is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed.Cir.1984).
Mr. Hicks sought our review of Board adjudications in two separate cases. He failed to file á petition for review before the statutory deadline for either case. Because this court did not receive a timely-filed petition for review, we have no authority to decide his case.
Accordingly,
It Is ORDERED That:
(1) The motion is granted and the case is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
584 F. App'x 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-united-states-postal-service-cafc-2014.