Hicks v. United States Department of Agriculture
This text of 84 F. App'x 725 (Hicks v. United States Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Linda Jane Hicks appeals the district court’s 1 order (1) granting summary judgment against her on her claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); (2) dismissing without prejudice her claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq.; (3) dismissing with prejudice her claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986; and (4) declining jurisdiction over any pendent state-law claims. After de novo review, see Turner v. Holbrook, 278 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir.2002), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-united-states-department-of-agriculture-ca8-2004.